Реестры - списки построенных ВС с фотографиями,
описанием их истории и другими подробностями.
Реестры составляются энтузиастами авиации на основании фотографий, расписания, открытых
данных и новостей от операторов и производителей.
Список авиакомпаний, эксплуатирующих ВС
отечественного производства в настоящее время или в прошлом.
Список составляется энтузиастами авиации на основании фотографий, расписания,
открытых данных от операторов и регуляторов ВТ.
МГА - Министерство гражданской авиации СССР, собирательное название - Аэрофлот,
правопреемник - Министерство транспорта РФ.
На этой странице собрана история и структура МГА, а также реестры управлений и отрядов МГА.
Некоторые самолёты и вертолёты после списания устанавливаются в качестве памятников
и в музеях.
В этом разделе на карте отмечены все известные авиапамятники по всему миру!
Маяки России
Шлюзы России
Подробная информация обо всех авиационных музеях и коллекциях, где представлены
отечественные ВС.
Контакты, режим работы, описание, история - и, конечно, фотографии.
Лента обновлений по всем реестрам самолётов и вертолётов.
Ан-124 "Руслан" - крупнейший в мире по грузоподъёмности серийный транспортный самолёт.
Предназначен для перевозки до 150 тонн груза на расстояния до 12 тысяч км.
Построено: 55 (1982-2004)
Ан-148, Ан-158 - семейство пассажирских самолётов, предназначенное для перевозки 80-100
пассажиров на расстояния до 4000 км.
Построено: 47 (2004-н.в.)
Бе-200 - реактивный самолёт-амфибия. Предназначен для перевозки до 8 тонн груза или до
12 м3 воды в баках, или до 64 пассажиров на дальность до 3100 км.
Доступен в противопожарном варианте.
Построено: 17 (1998-н.в.)
Ил-96 - семейство широкофюзеляжных дальнемагистральных самолётов, предназначенное для
перевозки до 300 пассажиров или до 92 тонн груза.
Построено: 30 (1988-н.в.)
SSJ-100 - ближнемагистральный пассажирский самолёт, разработанный компанией ГСС
при участии Alenia Aeronautica и Boeing.
Предназначен для перевозки до 98 пассажиров на расстояния до 3000 км.
Построено: 195 (2008-н.в.)
Ту-154 - семейство среднемагистральных самолётов, предназначенное для перевозки 150-180
пассажиров на расстояния до 5000 км.
Самый красивый самолёт в мире!
Построено: 926 (1968-2012)
Ту-204, Ту-214 - семейство средне-дальнемагистральных самолётов, предназначенное для перевозки
160-210 пассажиров на расстояния до 8000 км.
Построено: 86 (1989-н.в.)
Як-42 - среднемагистральный пассажирский самолёт, предназначенный для перевозки 100-120
пассажиров на расстояния до 2500 км.
Построено: 187 (1975-2003)
Добавление новой карточки в реестре, доступно только для редакторов реестра
Контроль карточек по соответствию данных и фотографий
Статистика по перевозкам пассажиров и грузов авиационным транспортом
Действующий государственный реестр гражданской авиации РФ.
Открытые данные Министерства Транспорта РФ.
Действующие сертификаты лётной годности воздушных судов РФ.
Открытые данные Министерства Транспорта РФ.
Авиационные компании - операторы гражданской авиации РФ.
Открытые данные Министерства Транспорта РФ.
Аэропорты - операторы аэродромов гражданской авиации РФ.
Открытые данные Министерства Транспорта РФ.
Сводные данные по выпуску отечественных самолётов и вертолётов разных классов
по данным реестров RussianPlanes.net
Сводные данные по выпуску отечественных судов разных типов
по данным реестров RussianShips.net
Список заводов, на которых строились ВС
Сводная информация по действующим и историческим ресурсам (в циклах, в годах),
назначенным срокам службы и межремонтным интервалам самолётов и вертолётов ГА РФ.
Сводная информация и характеристики отечественных авиационных двигателей.
@ OskarOH (2024-10-15 13:14) > Looks more like СССР-86728 to me.
Agree.
OskarOH | 2024-10-15 13:14 | 266308
@ Fencer (2024-10-15 11:43) > Фотографии https://vki5.okcdn.ru/i?r=BDHsYJQ9nKW8WSbKUwTOy... и > https://vki5.okcdn.ru/i?r=BDHsYJQ9nKW8WSbKUwTOy...
Looks more like СССР-86728 to me.
@ Вадим874 (2024-04-19 21:12) > Добраться до этого "Прочее - Дания"... И тд, и тп. Короче говоря, опубликовано, как надо. >
=Ну да, Ну да! Ага. Тут даже не то, что "недружественное государство" (визы и прочее) а Внуково банальное никто так за 7лет и не сфотографировал по человечьи, я например хотя и пригласил мастерством блеснуть, и точку на карте дал, и охраны нет
https://russianplanes.net/id221713 Как было 2 моих кадра на бегу, так и есть только они!
V | 2024-04-21 20:06 | 263074
Оскар, спасибо!
OskarOH | 2024-04-21 18:51 | 263068
@ V (2024-04-21 10:46) > Где находится этот самолёт? > Назовите его точный адрес или его точные координаты на спутниковых снимках? > Чтобы любой авиационный споттер смог туда приехать и качественно его > сфотографировать.
It is located in the Refshaleøen district of Copenhagen, Denmark, along Refshalevej. I have marked the exact location, to within a meter or two, on the map above.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/zVbLnCdJ36hW5GWH6
OskarOH | 2024-04-18 15:56 | 263030
@ X (2024-04-18 15:10) > Hi Oskar. I did not have your email address. I tried many times to send my > modified photo of yours through various channels on russianplanes.net but was > unable (or incapable) to attach it. Therefore I did it this way knowing my entry > will be deleted. After so many posts over two days I was only trying to help you > as it is a unique photo. It only took me two cut and pastes on Paint.
I\'m sorry if I sounded rude when I replied to your previous comment, that was not my intention. I appreciate that you\'re trying to help, and I will keep your advice in mind for the future. But as for right now, I\'m just tired of this discussion, and, yeah... Again, sorry if I sounded rude last time.
OskarOH | 2024-04-18 11:41 | 263019
@ Константин (2024-04-18 11:07) > да, это определенно глюки склейки панорамы в телефоне. > Глюки видны как на обеих гирляндах, так и на надписи "Аэрофлот" на борту. > Панорама ориентируется на наиболее толстые контрастные линии и совмещает кадры > по ним. Мелкие детали при этом могут не совпадать, отчего получаются артефакты. > То есть, дефект, но никак не злостный, а телефона.
Actually, both the Aeroflot and An-2 inscriptions are like that for real, and I have no idea why:
https://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/001708711.html
OskarOH | 2024-04-17 00:45 | 263002
@ Марат (2024-04-17 00:32) > https://vk.com/feed?w=wall-183242910_134573
Unfortunately, I don\'t have a VK account, but it\'s sad to see my picture just taken like that. I usually watermark my pictures, but since this site adds its own watermarks I decided against it. Oh well...
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 12:17 | 262998
@ Игорь Двуреков (2024-04-16 12:00) > Да, интересная ситуация. Допустим, если это плохая камера и она не быстро > фокусируется, то наверно гирлянда была бы либо смазанной, либо сдвинутой, но > целиком. Как мог отдельный кусок так слезть - непонятно. Либо какой-то хитрый > алгоритм процессора в камере. > Если же это фотошопные дела, то тоже непонятен смысл этого действа. Гирлянда всё > равно не убрана, в чём смысл - неясно. Короче загадка. Хорошо б на оригинал > взглянуть.
Like I said to Andrey, it\'s not the first time my camera has done something like this. And, yes, I realize why it looks strange. I think so too. But I have had this exact same thing happen before, when I photographed a moving bus: the side logo became partially shifted, but nothing else. The camera that I am using is my phone, a Samsung Galaxy A52s, with two working lenses out of three. The third one is completely broken. I don\'t know how those lenses work, if one is slower than the other, or whatnot. I don\'t know if that could effect the results. I don\'t know. All I know is that this has happened before, but it has been more obvious. The bus was a white logo on a yellow background. But this is not edited.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 12:09 | 262997
@ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 12:01) > Я не понимаю, что страшного, признать свою ошибку. Все ошибаются, всяко бывает. > Но когда отрицают очевидное, это верх наглости. Будь здоров и не кашляй ))
I\'m denying it because it\'s not true, not because of arrogance. I don\'t have any editing software. I\'ve never managed to learn any editing software. I\'ve tried, and I\'ve failed, multiple times. So I\'ve given up. I am far from perfect, and I admit that I make mistakes. Uploading this picture was a mistake, it seems like. But there is no EDITING mistake because there is no editing.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 11:57 | 262992
@ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 11:52) > @ OskarOH (2024-04-16 11:49) > > @ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 11:44) > > > Why are you lying? Well, you made a mistake, so admit it. Nothing wrong with > > > that. > > I am not lying, I don\\\\\\\'t even have any editing software apart from Microsoft > > Paint. This image has not been edited in any way apart from cropping and > sizing. > https://radikal.host/i/d6p7Mu
It\'s not the first time I have had something like that happen in a picture I\'ve taken, unfortunately.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 11:56 | 262991
@ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 11:54) > @ OskarOH (2024-04-16 11:49) > > I am not lying, I don\\\\\\\'t even have any editing software apart from Microsoft > > Paint. This image has not been edited in any way apart from cropping and > sizing. > If so, then I am Robinson Crusoe. ))
Well, it\'s very nice to meet you, mr Crusoe. Just wish it had been under better circumstances.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 11:49 | 262988
@ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 11:44) > Why are you lying? Well, you made a mistake, so admit it. Nothing wrong with > that.
I am not lying, I don\'t even have any editing software apart from Microsoft Paint. This image has not been edited in any way apart from cropping and sizing.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 11:28 | 262984
@ AndreyIKT (2024-04-16 11:14) > Look at the right garland above the plane.
There is no editing involved apart from cropping and shrinking. But I do see what you mean, and I understand why you would think it\'s been Photoshopped. But I can 100% promise you, it hasn\'t been. It was a very windy day, and my camera sometimes takes a second or so to actually take the picture, meaning the results aren\'t always great, especially if I\'m photographing moving objects, with some items in the picture appearing twice, not at all, squished, or stretched. If the garland was moving when I took the shot, which I suspect it was, that could explain it. So, yeah, not Photoshop. Just a slow/poor camera.
OskarOH | 2024-04-16 11:15 | 262983
I don\'t understand. The image has only been slightly cropped and downsized to fit the 1500 pixel width.
OskarOH | 18:51 It is located in the Refshaleøen district of Copenhagen, Denmark, along Refshalevej. I have marked the exact location, to within a meter or two, on the map above.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/zVbLnCdJ36hW5GWH6
OskarOH | 15:56 I\'m sorry if I sounded rude when I replied to your previous comment, that was not my intention. I appreciate that you\'re trying to help, and I will keep your advice in mind for the future. But as for right now, I\'m just tired of this discussion, and, yeah... Again, sorry if I sounded rude last time.
OskarOH | 11:41 Actually, both the Aeroflot and An-2 inscriptions are like that for real, and I have no idea why:
https://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/001708711.html
OskarOH | 00:45 Unfortunately, I don\'t have a VK account, but it\'s sad to see my picture just taken like that. I usually watermark my pictures, but since this site adds its own watermarks I decided against it. Oh well...
OskarOH | 12:17 Like I said to Andrey, it\'s not the first time my camera has done something like this. And, yes, I realize why it looks strange. I think so too. But I have had this exact same thing happen before, when I photographed a moving bus: the side logo became partially shifted, but nothing else. The camera that I am using is my phone, a Samsung Galaxy A52s, with two working lenses out of three. The third one is completely broken. I don\'t know how those lenses work, if one is slower than the other, or whatnot. I don\'t know if that could effect the results. I don\'t know. All I know is that this has happened before, but it has been more obvious. The bus was a white logo on a yellow background. But this is not edited.
OskarOH | 12:09 I\'m denying it because it\'s not true, not because of arrogance. I don\'t have any editing software. I\'ve never managed to learn any editing software. I\'ve tried, and I\'ve failed, multiple times. So I\'ve given up. I am far from perfect, and I admit that I make mistakes. Uploading this picture was a mistake, it seems like. But there is no EDITING mistake because there is no editing.
OskarOH | 11:57 It\'s not the first time I have had something like that happen in a picture I\'ve taken, unfortunately.
OskarOH | 11:56 Well, it\'s very nice to meet you, mr Crusoe. Just wish it had been under better circumstances.
OskarOH | 11:49 I am not lying, I don\'t even have any editing software apart from Microsoft Paint. This image has not been edited in any way apart from cropping and sizing.
OskarOH | 11:28 There is no editing involved apart from cropping and shrinking. But I do see what you mean, and I understand why you would think it\'s been Photoshopped. But I can 100% promise you, it hasn\'t been. It was a very windy day, and my camera sometimes takes a second or so to actually take the picture, meaning the results aren\'t always great, especially if I\'m photographing moving objects, with some items in the picture appearing twice, not at all, squished, or stretched. If the garland was moving when I took the shot, which I suspect it was, that could explain it. So, yeah, not Photoshop. Just a slow/poor camera.
OskarOH | 11:15 I don\'t understand. The image has only been slightly cropped and downsized to fit the 1500 pixel width.
X | 2024-04-18 14:42 | 263024
Hi Oskar, I did not have your email, I tried to contact you directly on the text messaging section but was totally unable to attach the photo I had modified. I asked Andrei Tsymbal to see if he could help but he was unable. So I did it this way assuming that my picture will be deleted once either you or they modified it. It only took two cut and pastes to correct the issue that created so many posts. As Kirin said it is a unique photo of this aircraft and I just wanted to help out. X
OskarOH | 2024-04-18 14:30 | 263023
@ X (2024-04-18 10:59) > OskarOH, From your name I assume you are Scandinavian and probably speak > English. Have you tried PhotoScapeX, a free download for photo alterations.
I am indeed Scandinavian, Swedish to be precise, and I do speak English. I have not tried PhotoScapeX but will keep it in mind for the future. However, like Andrey pointed out, you could have contacted me via private message, or email, or even comment under the original upload.
OskarOH | 14:30 I am indeed Scandinavian, Swedish to be precise, and I do speak English. I have not tried PhotoScapeX but will keep it in mind for the future. However, like Andrey pointed out, you could have contacted me via private message, or email, or even comment under the original upload.
I have no idea, unfortunately. I searched for the locomotive number on Google and the only owner I could find listed for it was Gorky Railway.
Андрей Цымбал | 2021-02-18 21:21 | 249192
Подскажите пожалуйста, как так получается, что у локомотива, сфотографированного на Украине и с украинской символикой, оказывается российская прописка?
Спасибо!
OskarOH | 21:27 I have no idea, unfortunately. I searched for the locomotive number on Google and the only owner I could find listed for it was Gorky Railway.
